What
is poetry? Poetry is words; no it is so much more than that. Poetry is
self-expression through depictions of situations and emotions by a
writer. Yes, but what about the reader; what is poetry to the reader?
Poetry is given value and meaning by the reader and the personal
experiences and point of view brought to the poem by the reader. All of
these things are true and fine but really what is poetry? According to
Webster poetry is “metrical
writing or the productions of a poet or a writing that formulates a
concentrated imaginative awareness of experience in language chosen and
arranged to create a specific emotional response through meaning, sound,
and rhythm or something likened to poetry especially in beauty of
expression.” Thanks Webster but what is poetry in and of its self. What
is the heart of poetry and how do I define it?
That
has been the guiding question for me this semester as I work through
English 210 Intro to Literature: Poetry. I thought I understood poetry
when I started this endeavored and described it as being
the use of language in means of rhetoric and syntax to present an idea
in a new creative or abstract manner. The literary style that is poetry
is less about what is being said and more about how it is said, in other
words a poem is a performance; because of this the interpretation of
each poem becomes dependent on each member of the audience. Sure I
still agree with this but I think that poetry can do more than just be a
performance and I believe that each poem has its own meaning and value
without any input from the reader.
Looking at each aspect of poetry separately I think is the best way to understand that poetry is like a puzzle in that it is several pieces that must be worked together to give the full picture of what the poet is trying to get across and what the reader is trying to discover. Form first, there are limitless forms from imagery and shape poetry to the very formal sonnet to blank verse to haiku the form and style is endless but as Audre Lorde says of her poetry, “I feel I have a duty to speak the truth as I see it and to share not just my triumphs, not just the things that felt good, but the pain, the intense, often unmitigated pain,” (Kulii). While each poet’s personal reason for writing poetry may differ they all do have some type of reason or purpose behind it, the value of understanding the different forms can help to give light to this meaning.
A
poet’s view of poetry is different from that of the reader. The poet
may view it as a form of fun or as an ink wasting toy. The
responsibility of the reader is to know enough about the poet and the
context of the poem to understand the message that the poem is trying to
give. There is the direct message that is the words on the page but
there is a sub message if you will that is in every poem. This is the
implied and inferred message that is read into by the reader and is
different for each person. Peter Fallon, an Irish poet who visited class
stated that he asks himself, “Do I trust this poem?” That is the best
question that a reader can ask of a poem, does what the direct content
state agree with the implied meaning of the reader. If not why and where
does the content differ? One example of this idea of form is seen in
Irena Klepfisz’s poem Bashert,
as she creates two smaller poems and constructs them in mirroring ways;
aligning the messages to be parallel so that there is a direct conflict
between the two while still giving the poem a kind of stability as it
pulls the reader through.
Poetry
acting as a form of self-expression for the poet can also mean acting
as a way for the poet to voice ideas of political or social injustices
of inequalities, in general just opinions that the poet may be
uncomfortable to openly state so they place them into a poem; causing
the audience to reflect upon the situation and dray their own
conclusions and opinions. In the anthology Against Forgetting: Twentieth Century Poetry of Witness
by Carolyn Forche, Forche states "the space between the state and the
supposedly safe haven of the personal," (Forche 31), implying the poetry
is that space and saying that it is a safe place for these conflicting
ideas or opinions. An example of a poet doing this is in the poem September 1, 1939
by W. H. Auden. Auden does not come out and openly describe the events
implied but rather makes implications and parallels. Kate Stoltzfus
described Auden’s poem as, “comparing the
human heart to a mad man writing about his lover - that humans have the
ability to love in spite of imperfections with complicated, messy
relationships,” (Stoltzfus).
To
the reader these ideas or opinions may be accepted or denied. The
function of poetry is to provide a means for the poet to invoke emotion
in the reader about a particular idea/event/situation. As Emily
Dickenson put it, “it [poetry] makes my whole body so cold no fire ever can warm me I know that is poetry. If I feel physically as if the top of my head were taken off, I know that is poetry. These are the only way I know it. Is there any other way," (Ryan).
Poetry
is more than just any one of the parts mentioned in this reflection and
so many more but it is important to understand the poetry is never just
one of these pieces. Poetry at its heart is the act of a poet forming a
message in some way for a reader to share or describe an emotion and
reaction to that message. The poet does this through form, style,
content, implied meaning, by invoking the emotions of the reader and as a
form of self-expression or reflection.
Works Cited
Forche,
Carolyn. Against Forgetting: Twentieth Century Poetry of Witness. New
York City: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1993. 170-73. Print.
Stoltsfuz, Kate. "Notes by Niginsky." Word. Blogger.com, 03 Oct 2011. Web. 6 Dec. 2011. <http://inspiirator.blogspot.com/2011/10/notes-by-nijinsky.html>.
Ryan, Michael. "My Favorite Poet: Emily Dickinson." Poets.org. The Acadamy of American Poets, 1997. Web. 6 Dec 2011. <http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/19269>.
